Every number behind the budget story
The Budget Story covers the four questions residents ask first. This page holds everything else — 11 sections, each a full section of real charts and tables, not a quick preview. Pick a topic below, or scroll straight through.
Choose what to explore
Actuals
Back to index ↑General Fund spending by department, FY2014–FY2025. FY2025 actual was $424.0M up from $183.2M in FY2014 — figures are nominal dollars, not adjusted for inflation or population growth.
FY2025 spending by department
No department-level breakdown on file for the latest year yet.
Total General Fund spending, FY2014–FY2025
Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports (audited actuals) and the adopted/proposed budget for years without an audit yet.
Budget vs. Actual
Back to index ↑FY2024 actual spending came in $6.6M (2.4%) below the adopted budget, and $6.0M below the final amended budget (the version council approved mid-year, after adjustments). Department-level variance below, largest first.
| Department | Adopted budget | Actual | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|
| General government | $31.3M | $23.9M | -$7.5M |
| Public works | $23.9M | $19.9M | -$4.0M |
| Public safety | $80.0M | $83.3M | +$3.3M |
| Education | $129.2M | $131.5M | +$2.3M |
| Culture and recreation | $11.4M | $10.9M | -$0.5M |
| Human services | $4.7M | $4.3M | -$0.3M |
Source: FY2024 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, budgetary comparison schedule.
Compensation
Back to index ↑Not enough data on file yet for this section.
Fund Balance
Back to index ↑The General Fund closed FY2024 with $22.5M in total fund balance. Reserves stood at 0.5 months of spending — a “red” level, though the trend has been declining. Unassigned balance — money with no earmark — is shown separately below; most of what's held is often assigned to specific future uses, not freely available.
FY2024 balance composition
- Assigned27.5%
- Unassigned43.0%
Unassigned balance, FY2014–FY2024
Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports, governmental funds balance sheet.
Pension Obligations
Back to index ↑The tread water threshold is the minimum annual contribution that keeps the unfunded pension liability from growing — normal cost plus interest on the existing shortfall. Paying below it means the liability grows even while payments are being made. In None of the last 0 years, contributions to the Miscellaneous plan fell short of tread water; the Safety plan fell short in None of 0 years. Combined net pension liability reached — as of FYNone.
Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports, net pension liability by plan.
Structural Balance
Back to index ↑Structural balance measures whether recurring revenues cover recurring expenditures — set aside one-time items like asset sales, capital spending, or inter-fund transfers. A surplus means ongoing operations are self-sustaining; a deficit means the city is using one-time money to fund ongoing services. FY2024 closed with a structural deficit of $15.0M (3.8% of recurring revenue). 9 of the last 11 years closed with a structural deficit.
Recurring revenue minus recurring expenditure, FY2014–FY2024
A structural surplus can coexist with a falling fund balance — that happens when the balance decline comes from inter-fund transfers (a financing decision) rather than weaker operations. Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports.
Net Position
Back to index ↑Net position is the government-wide equivalent of net worth — total assets minus total liabilities, including long-term obligations like pensions, OPEB, and bonded debt that don't appear in the General Fund figures above. Total net position was -$762.2M at the end of FY2023, down $34.3M for the year. Of that total, unrestricted position was a deficit of $1103.1M — a common condition for cities carrying significant pension liabilities when negative.
Composition, FY2023 (excludes unrestricted)
- Net investment in capital assets-40.0%
- Restricted-4.7%
Total net position, FY2014–FY2023
Government-wide figures use full accrual accounting (GASB 34) and differ from the General Fund fund-balance figures above, which use modified accrual accounting and exclude long-term liabilities. Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports, statement of net position.
Revenue Volatility
Back to index ↑Coefficient of variation (CoV) measures year-to-year swings as a share of the average — higher means less predictable, and a volatile source needs bigger reserves to absorb a down year. The bigger risk sits in Real estate and personal property taxes, net of tax refunds: it grew from $183.5M to $246.7M over this window — a large, now-load-bearing revenue source worth watching.
Volatility ranking
CoV computed across all years on file. Transfers excluded — they’re financing activity, not operating revenue. Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports, governmental funds revenue detail.
All-Funds Overview
Back to index ↑Not enough data on file yet for this section.
Assets
Back to index ↑The city carries $1139.2M in net book value of capital assets — infrastructure, buildings, land, and equipment, net of depreciation — as of FY2024.
Net book value by category, FY2024
Capital improvement plan, by category
No capital improvement plan on file yet.
Source: Annual Comprehensive Financial Report capital asset schedules; adopted Capital Improvement Program.
Finance Decoder
Back to index ↑Seven fiscal-health indicators based on the Strong Towns Finance Decoder methodology, computed from government-wide (governmental activities) data in the ACFRs. The composite read for FY2024 is red, with a declining multi-year trend on net financial position — it peaked at -$260.9M in FY2014.
Net financial position, FY2014–FY2024
Net Financial Position
-$1944.0M
Liquid assets minus total liabilities. Negative means obligations exceed financial assets — the city is relying on future revenues to cover past bills.
Financial Assets-to-Liabilities
0.10×
Liquid assets ÷ total liabilities. Below 1.0 means the city cannot pay off its obligations with financial assets alone.
Assets-to-Liabilities
0.56×
Total assets (including infrastructure) ÷ total liabilities. Below 1.0 = insolvent; above 1.0 = owns more than it owes.
Net Debt-to-Total Revenues
1.62×
Years of revenue needed to pay off net debt. Zero means no net debt. A rising trend would signal growing unsustainability.
Interest-to-Total Revenues
6.5%
Share of revenue consumed by interest payments. Rising = past borrowing crowding out current services.
Net Book-to-Cost of Capital Assets
0.76×
Current value ÷ original cost of infrastructure. A declining trend signals aging assets and deferred maintenance.
Government Transfers-to-Total Revenues
27.3%
Share of revenue from state/federal aid. Rising = more exposure to funding decisions outside local control.
Based on the Strong Towns Finance Decoder. Source data is governmental activities only. Some years pending ACFR backfill.